« The Farcical Freeze | Main | Oh, the Irony: The Market Speaks, and Obama Has to Listen! »

February 05, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a01156e348543970c0128776691bb970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Every Economist, Mr. President? No, sir!:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Dr. Jarrell,

I have recently picked up reading your blog and thoroughly enjoy it; thank you for taking the time to produce this!

Could you please shed some light on why you believe, without any stimulus, the nation's unemployment rate would be much lower today?

Regards,

Faithful reader

Thank you! Sure, I'm happy to answer your question. I've touched on it in earlier posts about government spending. In my view, because government spending is funded with taxes that would have been invested by private industry in value-creating activities, we lose economic value with every dollar the government spends. I think people forget that it is business profits that generates every dollar of taxes collected by the state, local and federal governments and that, if not for the taxation, those businesses would do more of whatever they did in the first place to create the profits that enabled those taxes. This includes buying more capital and hiring more labor. Some taxation is necessary, of course, to pay for public goods, like defense, but even then we are trading off economic wealth. I hope that answers your question!

Sherry

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment