Yesterday, I posted part 1 of 3 parts on the saga of the 1998 Daimler purchase of Chrysler in which I set up the question: would the Daimler Chrysler merger, with its internationally traded share and U.S. disclosure rules, be enough to offset the secrecy of the German corporate governance standards at the time of the merger? In today's post, I provide the answer:
When DaimlerChrysler (DCX) incorporated it adopted German corporate governance standards. U.S.
institutional ownership in Chrysler was largely replaced by European banks that
not only directly monitor the working capital financing of DCX but also may sit
on its Management and Supervisory Boards.
Such superior access and corporate control created distinct advantages
for large German institutional owners relative to minority owners; foreign
shareholders in the U.S.
found themselves among this minority group. These advantages included the ability to:
expropriate the private benefits of control from minority shareholders; share
these benefits with management, effectively creating a collusion, and; profit
from trading DCX shares with superior information. As a result, minority owners priced their
shares less aggressively – i.e., the bid-ask spread widened -- to minimize
their losses from transacting with controlling shareholders. As their spread increased, U.S. minority shareholders’ trading costs rose
and U.S. trading volume fell
as it migrated to Germany,
the relatively cheaper trading venue.
The
merger between Chrysler and Daimler and consequent changes in corporate
governance create an ideal clinical study for isolating our hypothesis about the
failure of the enhanced disclosure requirements to effectively compensate for
lax corporate governance standards in protecting minority shareholders. To test this
hypothesis, we explored changes in the bid-ask spread that are associated with
the change in corporate governance and the control over the flow of information
about the Chrysler assets. We
look “inside” the trading mechanism that creates the observed transacted stock
price, namely the bid-ask spread, to generate evidence on shifts in the quality
and quantity of information available to minority versus controlling
shareholders. The bid-ask spread should
grow as minority shareholders learn that traders on the other side of the
spread possess superior information about the company, information which is linked
to their majority control of the firm and its senior management compensation,
asset disposition, and financing and risk-taking strategies.
We found that the
decision to merge and become a German stock corporation significantly weakened
the protection of minority shareholders, particularly
prior owners of Chrysler assets, and led to their
expropriation by controlling shareholders and principal creditors of the consolidated
firm. The
answer lies in the lack of protection afforded minority shareholders by the German corporate governance structure of the newly combined DCX entity.
Recent Comments